Well…. That was a rather interesting blog. I will do my best
to try to understand it as I go. Today articles and news stories are written to
please the press, and that is all. What Jeff Jarvis wants to do is use a new
model of creating news called the Press Sphere. This can, “thanks to links, add
up a story and to fulfilling the need or desire for news and information.” The
press is still involved, but there is a whole plethora of other sources as
well, and readers can be directly involved in the process. What I find
interesting and confusing about this is the amount of collaboration this
seemingly requires. It gives the impression that stories would be created from
a more numerable amount of sources and critics. While this could create very
true and reliable news stories, it seems like it would be impractical in
regards to time. How would stories be written so that their readers have the
most current information when the story would have so many to things to take
into account. People want timely news. If another paper writes a story 3 days
before the paper employing this method which paper will get the most views? The
faster one. Maybe it has to be a step by step process as we add more to the
press sphere. We see in blogging that links and the viewers opinions are
strongly taken into account. That is what has made blogging so popular in the
last 9 years. It creates a community of people who comment on others blogs and
respond to it. The New York Times online is using more links to cites sources
used in there articles. It is obvious they are drawing from multiple sources,
and they are not writing only form the press. The news articles take into
consideration more than they would have in the past making them more accurate
and interesting to read.
I welcome any criticism to this post. I did my best to
understand, and I welcome any other clarifying opinions on the post. Thank you!
No comments:
Post a Comment