Literacy is definitely a hard thing to define, but I believe the purposes
of being literate are what define it. I think back to my literacy learning
throughout my life, and it has been to accomplish one thing: to move on to
something more. Literacy for me was taught to accomplish something, and then I
learn perpetually as the challenges become…..more challenging. This continues
until you feel you have learned enough to function well in society. I find it
interesting how each of the authors define literacy in a different way.
Scribner seems to associate literacy to its function or purpose whether that is
attaining power, adapting to society, or acquiring grace. Lundsford merely
describes literacy as the ability to read and write, and she states that
literacy it on the rise among youth. It may not be in the traditional sense,
but with texting, email, and social networking people are writing more than
they ever have before. This is quite positive compared to the writings of Carr
and Hedges. Their writings are about how the internet is affecting our
literacy. Hedges is quite ruthless when saying that Americans are more
illiterate now than they have been in past. He even uses many facts in regards
to the vocabulary used in presidential debates now compared to the past. I
would have to say I disagree. Americans are not becoming illiterate; we are
simply adapting to a new age a literacy. The fact is, profound or not, we are
writing more than ever before, and the biggest concern is how this will affect
our writing and the way we think. The truth is that we do not know, though I am
excited to see how even basic education changes because of purposes for writing
in this ever-expanding world of knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment